The debate on the appropriate makeup of the nation’s federalism is
again brought to the fore. Senator Ike Ekweremadu’s intervention
was another yell in the increasingly vociferous debate on the country’s
structural frame.
Delivering a lecture at the weekend, the deputy President of the
Senate brought focus to what he described as the feeding bottle
federalism that is presently obtainable in the country.
Senator Ekweremadu spoke while delivering the Sixth Annual Oputa
Lecture at the Osgoode Hall Law School, York University in Toronto,
Canada at the weekend.
His lecture titled “Nigerian Federalism: A Case for a Review” is
undoubtedly bound to elicit interest among students of Nigeria’s
federalism. It would also be of interest to power brokers who have
thrived as the nation’s federal system foundered over time.
Before Ekweremadu’s intervention last week, some other frontline
commentators including Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN had intervened with
similar suggestions on redefining the nature of the country’s
federalism.
In Agbakoba’s submission made last June just as the present National
Assembly commenced deliberation, he suggested among others that the 36
states of the federation should be knocked down into their respective
geopolitical zones which should be recognized as the basis of the
nation’s federation. He claimed to have prepared a bill to actualize
that purpose.
With power conceded to the six geopolitical zones the country in his
dream could then have six super Governors administering the six
geopolitical zones with the states maybe reduced to at best provinces or
administrative units.
The submission elicited some reactions with the Conference of
Nigerian Political Parties, CNPP being the most vociferous in its
commendation of the proposal.
Welcoming the Agbakoba bill on returning the country to true federalism, the body said in a statement last year,
“The CNPP supports the convergence of national consensus on the
imperative to return Nigeria to a True Federal Republic as distinct from
the Unitary System of government being practiced today; hence the
clamour and urgency to amend the 1999 Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria,” the body said in a statement issued on its behalf
by its spokesman, Osita Okechukwu.
“Public commentators have queried the inelegant manner in which a
Constitution with the tag Federal Republic is structured and chartered
along Unitary System of government.”
“It is our considered view that the inherent capacity for True
Federalism to accommodate multi-ethnic nationalities and their
diversities without undermining national unity; was what made our
founding fathers to adopt Federalism in the London Constitutional
Conference of 1953.
“We accordingly endorse the Bill submitted to the National Assembly
by Mr Olisa Agbakoba, (SAN), the position of the Nigerian Governors’
Forum for review of the Revenue Allocation Formula and the agitation of
many patriots for true federalism.”
It was as such remarkable that Senator Ekweremadu would amplify the
debate, albeit in a subtle manner. Ekweremadu’s suggestion on the
collapse of the states is, however, contrary to the aspiration of his
immediate political associate, Senator David Mark who to the bemusement
of many, is seemingly fixated with creating at least one more state.
Mark is from the Idoma ethnic group in Benue State.
The Idoma people have never produced a Governor for the state and
believe that their only way of having an Idoma Governor is through the
creation of an Apa State compassing the Idoma nation. Mark has at almost
all functions involving his people continued to reiterate that promise.
Ekweremadu’s lecture, however, skirted around the issue of the
recklessness of creating more states. He, however, thrust sharply with
his submission that the country’s federalism is deformed, a development
he said had hindered economic and political growth.
The deputy Senate President was to liken the nation’s federalism as a
master-servant relationship, a submission many of the nation’s state
Governors would no doubt agree with.
He also recalled the period between 1954 and 1966 which he described
as the golden era of the country’s federalism on account of the
prosperity and viability recorded among the three regions of the country
in that period.
Read More...
No comments:
Post a Comment